The Inter–Party Advisory Council (IPAC) has applauded President Muhammadu Buhari for withholding assent to the amended electoral act bill due to the inclusion of the contentious compulsory direct party primary clause for political parties.
Addressing journalists in Abuja to mark the commencement of business in the New Year, national chairman of the council and chairman of the African Democratic Party (ADP), Mr. Yabagi Yusuf, said Nigeria at the present level of political development, was not yet ripe for direct primary as a means for political parties to elect their candidates.
He said the legislation on direct primaries amounts to an attempt to usurp the constitutional rights of parties as to the method of choice of electing party flag bearers.
“IPAC is impressed with the lawmakers for the courage, commitment and patriotism exhibited in the passage of a bill that was widely applauded as groundbreaking and transformative in the annals of the nation’s legislative chambers.
“Lawmakers, this time, disregarded partisan differences in favour of superior national interest, and stood in a spirited battle in the course of democracy even in the face of intimidation and blackmail.
“The only expressed grouse of the president was the mandatory use of direct primary in the selection of standard bearers of all the political parties. While many never concede to the explanations of security challenges with the other reasons given by the president, we won’t disagree with him on the reason of complex logistics and huge financial burden that direct primary will imply for Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“Many have canvassed the view that no amount of money should be considered too high in the efforts to sanitise the nation’s electoral process and that the legislature should therefore, invoke its veto powers to overrule the president. Such action may be tantamount to a wholesale wrecking of the boat. It will result in fruitless exercise if at the end of the day, its implementation was not supported by the required funding by the executive.
“Lawmakers may have acted as interlopers by trying to run political parties from the hallowed chambers because, objectively in the context of international practices primary cannot be legislated upon, and are best left to the discretion of the political parties. It’s an attempt to usurp the constitutional rights of parties as to the method of choice of party standard bearers,” he said.
He further said stated that the Nigerian constitution (as amended) recognises that the issue use of direct or indirect primary election is an internal affair of political parties.
IPAC submitted that the way out of the logjam was for the shifting of grounds by all parties for a compromise and amicable resolution that would result in a win-win scenario.
“This should not be a difficult task given that the two arms are, incidentally, controlled by the same political party, the All Progressives Congress.
Lawmakers should simply expunge the clauses regarding direct primary, thereby, saving the other provisions among which are the one on the mandatory electronic transmission of election results by INEC. By that, we believe the president should have no further reason to withhold his assent,” he added.
To avoid further pitfalls in the remodeling and implementation of the proposed legislation, IPAC suggested that the legislature and executive should consider carrying Council along in view of the fact that the bill directly affects its members and the political parties who would implement the law when eventually enacted.
IPAC also raised concerns over the flagrant abuse of the constitution regarding defection from one political party to another.
“Constitutional provision stipulates that elected officials can only legally change from one party to another while in office if a clear case of divisions or fictionalisation is perceived to exist in the party on whose platform he or she rode to the office in the first instance.
“Most incidences of defections in recent times, have occurred without the obvious existence of such situations. We must know that frivolous and wilful cross carpeting only exists in a parliamentary democracy and not in a presidential system of democracy that is extant in Nigeria.”
