The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a suit at the Federal High Court in Lagos to stop the senate president, Dr. Bukola Saraki from paying N14.2 million as salary and allowances to the former governor of Plateau State, Senator Joshua Dariye who is serving a 10-year jail term for N1.162 billion fraud while he was governor between 1999-2007.
It would be recalled that Dariye who represents Plateau Central in the senate was handed down a 14-year jail term by Justice Adebukola Banjoko of the Federal Capital Territory High Court, Abuja on June 12, 2018.
But on November 16, 2018, Justice Stephen Adah of the Appeal Court, Abuja slashed the sentence to 10 years after hearing the convict’s appeal against Banjoko’s verdict.
But six months into his imprisonment, he is reported to be receiving his full pay and other allowances.
In the suit a suit marked FHC/L/CS/2146/18 and filed last Friday, SERAP argued that by paying Dariye’s allowances while in prison, Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission had destroyed the efficacy and purpose of Dariye’s conviction and had brought the rule of law and administration of justice into disrepute.
The 15-page lawsuit reads in part: “Mr. Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission should be immediately restrained from unlawfully paying salaries and allowances to Mr. Dariye who is serving jail term. Restraining them would send a clear message to Nigerian elected officials that corruption does not pay and contribute to promoting accountability and fostering public trust and confidence in Nigeria’s democracy, the rule of law and the governance system.
“By paying Mr. Dariye’s allowances while in prison, Mr. Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission have destroyed the efficacy and purpose of Mr. Dariye’s conviction and have brought the rule of law and administration of justice into disrepute. SERAP and the public are alarmed by the action of Mr. Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission and they ought to be restrained by this Honourable Court.
“Mr. Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission should not be allowed to continue to make a mockery of the rule of law, our process of administration of justice and our judicial system by behaving as if the Nigerian Senate is not bound by the court judgment which convicted and sentenced Dariye for corruption. Mr. Saraki and the Nigerian Senate should be compelled to respect and obey decisions of the court.
“By continuing to pay Mr. Dariye’s allowances after his conviction and while in Kuje prison and unable to sit and perform the functions of a sitting senator, Mr. Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission have played a negative role to wit: undermining the authority and integrity of the court. Mr. Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission knew or ought to know that Mr. Dariye has been convicted and sentenced and now serving his jail term in Kuje prison pursuant to a decision of a competent court.
“Mr. Dariye, having been convicted, sentenced and currently serving jail term in Kuje prison can no longer by virtue of his imprisonment lawfully carry out or perform the duties of a senator. Mr. Dariye ordinarily ceases to be a senator, as per the provisions of section 66 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (as amended).
“Section 68(1) provides that a senator shall vacate his/her seat if any circumstances arise that would cause him/her to be disqualified for election as senator. This is exactly what happened to Mr. Dariye, who is, as a result of his imprisonment, no longer fit to be a senator let alone be entitled to allowances of a sitting senator. Similarly, a senator shall vacate his/her seat if without just cause, he/she is absent from meetings of the Senate, for a period amounting in the aggregate to more than one-third of the total number of days during which the Senate meets in any one year
“Mr. Dariye is no longer a senator having been convicted, sentenced and currently serving prison terms and having been in prison since June 12, 2018, he is caught by the provision of section 68(1)(f) as it is practically impossible for him to sit as senator.
“Mr. Dariye, having been absent for a period amounting in the aggregate to more than one-third of the total number of days during which the Senate meets in 2018, is disqualified and therefore his seat has automatically become vacant. Mr. Dariye is no longer entitled to be paid and/or to receive the allowances of a sitting and serving senator.
“Mr. Dariye’s conviction remains in effect until it is set aside. Therefore, the argument that he has appealed his conviction will not hold water. A judgment of a competent court of law subsists until set aside on appeal. The Supreme Court of Nigeria has made this point very clear in several cases.
“So long as the decision exists, it must be obeyed to the letter. A judgment of court, no matter the fundamental vice that afflict it, remains legally binding and valid until set aside by due process of law. As the Supreme Court has said, the judiciary like all citizens of this country cannot be a passive on-looker when any person attempts to subvert the administration of justice and will not hesitate to use the powers available to it to do justice in the cases before it.
“Mr. Dariye cannot justly and reasonably earn the allowances of a sitting and serving senator, having been convicted and sentenced and serving a prison term. Under the common law principle of money had and received, Mr. Dariye is under a legally binding duty to return all such salaries and allowances to the public treasury, having not justly earned such. Mr. Dariye should be compelled to return the allowances he has received so far since his conviction.”
SERPA asked the court to issue an order compelling Dariye to return all salaries and allowances paid to him as a senator while in prison, having not performed the functions and office of a sitting and serving senator and having not deservedly earned such.
“Unless the reliefs sought are granted, Mr. Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission will continue to act in flagrant defiance of the judgment of the court, the independence and authority of the court, and the rule of law. It is in the interest of justice to grant this application as the Defendants have nothing to lose if the application is granted,” it added.
However, no date was fixed for the hearing of the suit.
