South African court quashes Henry Okah’s appeal challenging terrorism conviction

0
823
*Okah

A High Court in Pretoria, South Africa has turned down the application by the leader of the defunct Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), Mr. Henry Okah challenging his trial and conviction on 13 counts of terrorism-related activities.

The court dismissed the appeal with a cost.

The MEND leader was convicted in 2013 and sentenced to 24 years in jail for the 2010 bombings in Abuja and Warri which left about three people dead.

Channels TV quoted Judge Moses Mavundla as saying that it is a common cause that the applicant had already taken his conviction on appeal to both the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court.

He agreed with the submission of the respondents that the general principle is that a convicted and sentenced person cannot appeal against it more than once.
In his view, a decision contrary to that general principle will lead to a chaotic judicial situation.

On the challenge of jurisdiction, he noted that the applicant had pleaded not guilty and exercised his rights to silence. As such, in the absence of a Lack of Jurisdiction plea, it is deemed that the court has jurisdiction.

The judge ordered the applicant to pay the taxes and allowed costs for the first, second and third respondents – the state, the director of public prosecutions and the minister of police).

However, Okah, while speaking with Channels TV said he was going to fight on.
In November 2017, he challenged the trial and conviction at the South African Constitutional Court, which he lost.

Justice Edwin Cameron ruled that the trial under the Anti-terrorism Act of South Africa was in line with the country’s international obligations.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here