Come clean about airfare hike – FCCPC tells AON

0
511
*Irukera

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has taken with a pinch of salt the denial by the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) that it is not responsible for increase of airfare to N50, 000 for a one-way flight.

Recall that last week airfares rose so astronomically that a one-way ticket which used to cost between ₦27, 000 and ₦29, 000 sold for N50, 000.

While Nigerians expressed concern about the sudden increase, the AON debunked denied that it colluded to the fix N50, 000 base fare for a one-way ticket for domestic travel.

However, the executive vice chairman/chief executive officer of FCCPC, Mr. Babatunde Irukera said in a press release entitled, ‘Coordinated increase in airfares by certain scheduled domestic airline operators’ said AON should come clean about the price fixing stressing that the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act (FCCPA abhors such conduct by the airlines’ umbrella organisation.

The statement issued in Abuja on Wednesday said the FCCPC became aware that the domestic airlines under the aegis of AON, after a series of meetings over a period of three weeks including on Thursday, February 17, 2022 and Saturday, February 19, 2022 in supposedly association meetings discussed multiple industry-wide issues; particularly challenges experienced by AON members.

Issues discussed, according to FCCPC, included foreign exchange, cost of ground handling services, rising cost of jet fuel and air fares.

It said the commission’s preliminary investigation revealed the meeting dates of AON to have been on or about February 8, February 17 and February 23, 2022.

The investigation also confirmed that one of the items of discussion during at least one of those meetings was to set base or minimum air fares.

It said the commission’s understanding from intelligence so far gathered is that there was significant controversy and/or an initial lack of consensus with respect to coordinated conduct resulting in setting air fares.

Furthermore, the statement said the commission had credible information that while attendees at the meeting may not have arrived at a consensus, the meeting ended in a resolution that encouraged, permitted or consented to the coordinated conduct.

“The Commission’s understanding from the deliberations at the meeting is that the attendees engaged in mutual discussions and exchange of their respective revenue management models or other commercially sensitive information.

“In furtherance of the discussions and or resolution at the meeting, certain champions of the coordinated conduct of imposing a base fare or a Minimum Re-Sale Price (MRSP) for their services in a coordinated and contemporaneous manner proceeded to increase their fares to a minimum of N50, 000 across all sectors.

“Specifically, Air Peace, Azman Air and United Nigeria Airlines immediately proceeded with the increase. Arik followed however, on Friday, February 18, 2022 at 6:31pm.

“Aero Contractors informed its trade partners (travel agents) and its commercial executive team by email that ticket fares were reviewed effective February 18, 2022 with the least fare being N50, 000 across all routes.

“Aero Contractors noted in this communication that all other airlines have effected same increase.

“Within days, Max Air also increased fares to the same minimum N50, 000.

“Ibom Air and Dana approximately 48 hours after what appears to be the initial coordinated conduct also increased fares although not to the purported N50, 000 minimum.

“Green Africa Airlines maintained its existing fares between N33, 000 and N38, 650 but has progressively increased its fares rising to approximately N47, 000 on its Lagos-Abuja route on Wednesday, February 23, 2022,” Irukera stated

The FCCPC further said AON’s action is antithetical to the FCCPA.

“The FCCPA prohibits conduct or any coordination between competitors including on the platform of trade associations. Specifically, Section 107 (1) (a) forbids competitors from fixing prices, and Section 108 prohibits any conspiracy, combination, agreement or arrangement between competitors in any manner that unduly restrains or injures competition. Coordination in increasing prices (otherwise known as cartel) is an unambiguous infringement of the FCCPA.

“Further, the current and prevailing Nigerian Civil Aviation Regulations (Air Transport Economic Regulations) in Regulation 18.15.2 (i) and (iii) expressly prohibits airlines from engaging in any contract, arrangement, understanding, conspiracy or combination in restraint of competition which includes directly or indirectly fixing a charge, fee, rate, fare or tariff and any collusive action.

The FCCPA, Civil Aviation Act and implementing regulations of both legislations respect the right and prerogative of airlines (as other businesses) to set their fares independently subject to, and in accordance with prevailing law and applicable processes.

“However, prevailing law expressly prohibits coordination, agreement or cooperation between competitors in setting fares. As such, the Commission with the collaboration of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) has commenced an investigation with respect to this subject.

“Although the investigation is at early stages, there is sufficient probable cause to proceed and also provide interim measures to restore a free and undistorted domestic aviation market.

“In the circumstances,  the commission is in addition to engaging the relevant stakeholders entering and dispatching interim orders under Sections 17(a),(e),(l),(s),18(3)(a), 157 and 158 of the FCCPA prohibiting  the performance or continuation of any agreement or arrangement associated with, or resulting from discussions, deliberations, debates, argument or resolutions of/at any meeting of the AON or its members regarding any increase in air fares and or any conduct not necessarily directly in compliance, but in response to changes in the market on account of  a compliance by others.”

The Commission enjoins scheduled domestic airline operators to ensure strict and prompt compliance with the Interim Order pending outcome of the Commission’s investigation.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here